The question is what exactly has Twitter found in using voice as a material form that other platforms haven’t? Even being adopted as SEO practices .
There is a high expectation that voice usage will continue to increase as a result of improved use of mobile devices such as:
- Smartphones ;
- iPads;
- smartwatches;
- Personal assistants.
Voice as a form of advertising promotion, however, still needs to be analyzed extensively by major social media platforms.
Twitter especially jumped in the middle of a stunt to release a feature that looked cool but ultimately didn’t live up to expectations.
What went wrong with Twitter
Some problems hampered the development of voice tweets : which stayed together with the elections in the United States and in Brazil they did some tests.
Once the voice tweets were published, they were not readily available to users directly, and this generated a lot of anger from people who were not able to utilize the new attribute, as it was a beta (test).
Also, the US election was six months away, and there was too much to do, resulting in people’s attention straying from voice tweets and what Donald Trump said every day.
Assuming the attribute would have been published in another period, it could have been better and more people embraced the voice for a kind of article advertising.
But, Twitter has always been basically understood as something that is basically text-based and simple to scan.
Can voice producers film?
People today access interpersonal sites to quickly consume content and even tons of information.
One reason movie articles work so much better than voice articles is that you can add subtitles to movies, allowing individuals to follow along without having to listen to anything.
This can be extremely beneficial during a busy commute or normally if you don’t want other people to hear exactly what you’re hearing but for some reason don’t have your own headset.
Another reason the voice knows it’s hard to outrun video is the lack of aesthetics that include the film’s content.
This for many individuals is a big element in determining the types of items they want to consume.
When thinking about the desirable self-image of social media users, they often look to represent certain elements in their feeds.
For other people to see and thus have a direct contact with the viewer, a very common strategy in digital marketing .
Therefore, the uniqueness and freshness that can be portrayed in videos is practically impossible to discover in voice content.
This could easily be an element that may have contributed to this dearth of Twitter voice chat adoption, but also in nature, the film is here to stay (and potentially dominate) for the long haul.
However, how do podcasts continue to be common?
While podcasts remain quite popular types of articles to consume, they have been hit hard by the outbreak as they were often consumed while people were commuting to and from work.
Not to mention that podcasts aren’t perfect in the current climate. However, voice type content may have different types and may not be acceptable for mainstream social media platforms.
With podcasts , most people know well in advance that they are likely to come up with around 25 minutes of audio.
Knowing this (along with the name of this podcast ) helps them prepare for the sound they’re about to hear, and generally, there’s no deviation from the subject at hand.
Voice content on interpersonal networking platforms offers an entirely different perspective for consuming content.
Unlike podcasts , even sharing voice information on social sites will be much more brief and vague because users won’t understand exactly what will be contained in this message.
This makes it more challenging to wait for material that has been absorbed, unless, of course, you assume it will be associated with other types of content that the person shares on their social site profile.
The potential of voice articles
There are numerous possibilities when it comes to how voice can be utilized as part of a content advertising strategy and by the digital marketing agency .
The crux of its all-encompassing voice will return to simplicity of use, which will be the situation with social sites today.
As long as voice articles can be simple to make, discuss, and consume, they should have no problem being used by larger audiences across multiple platforms.
But with popular programs like Facebook, WhatsApp, and Instagram known for allowing consumers to send voice messages to friends, it’s interesting that this alternative can’t be shared with the masses simultaneously.
Do these tech giants find no demand for this type of article sharing, or are they too passive about trying out new items on their own platforms?
Additional (considerably smaller) programs like Telegram provide voice chats, using their specific use cases described.
However, there is a void in the world of social media where voice material can be used in a more common environment.
Over time, it will be intriguing to see how voice articles will be used on platforms like Twitter.
